Skip to main content
Education only. ClearMoneySchool does not provide individualized investment, tax, or legal advice. Why we don't give advice →

A Lender's Fee Line and Its Noninterest Income Line Are Not the Same Number. In One Recent Quarter the Fee Subtotal Was Larger Than the Total It Sits Inside.

Noninterest income is the part of a lender's earnings that does not come from charging for the use of money. Readers treat it as the fee total. In one lender's figures for the second quarter of 2026 the line called total fee revenue came to $3,374 million while total noninterest income came to $3,325 million, because a $49 million securities loss is netted into the larger heading. The fee number is the bigger of the two.

Consumer FinanceOctober 11, 2026Edited by Joseph Citizen, FounderUpdated October 11, 2026

The simple version

A lender earns in two ways. It charges for the use of money, and it charges for everything else it does.

The second kind is gathered under one heading, and readers treat that heading as the total of what customers were charged. It is close, and it is not the same thing.

Gains and losses on the lender's own securities sit under the same heading. So it can move in a quarter when customers were charged no more than before.

The numbers

  • Total noninterest income: $3,325 million for the second quarter of 2026 against $2,924 million a year earlier (U.S. Bancorp, Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, second quarter 2026 earnings release)
  • "Total fee revenue", a subtotal inside it: $3,374 million against $2,981 million (same release)
  • "Securities gains (losses), net": negative $49 million against negative $57 million (same release)
  • Components, this quarter against a year earlier: card revenue $435m and $413m; corporate payment and treasury management revenue $440m and $421m; merchant processing services $485m and $474m; trust and investment management fees $785m and $703m; lending and deposit-related fees $308m and $277m; capital markets revenue $512m and $315m; mortgage banking revenue $169m and $162m; investment products fees $102m and $90m; other $138m and $126m (same release)
  • Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis: $4,387 million against $4,080 million. As reported: $4,361 million against $4,051 million (same release)
  • The release carries no line named service charges (same release)

Why a subtotal can exceed the total it sits in

Normally a subtotal is smaller than its total, because a total is the subtotal plus something else. Here the something else is negative.

The heading gathers two unlike things. One is what customers were charged for services. The other is what the lender made or lost selling its own holdings.

When the second is a loss, adding it shrinks the heading below the customer-charge subtotal inside it. The subtotal is the cleaner read of what customers actually paid.

The actual math on 3,374 and 3,325

Start with the fee subtotal of $3,374 million. Add the securities line of negative $49 million and you get $3,325 million, the reported total.

Now the growth rates, which differ. The total rose 13.7% from a year earlier and the fee subtotal rose 13.2%, so the heading grew faster than the customer-charge piece inside it.

The single biggest driver is not a customer charge at all. Capital markets revenue went from $315 million to $512 million, a rise of about 63%, which is about half of the increase.

What this means

If a headline says a lender's fee income jumped, the figure behind it may be the heading rather than the fees. The two move apart, and in this quarter they moved apart in both directions at once.

The line closest to ordinary account charges is the one named for lending and deposit-related fees, and here it is a small share of the heading. Trading and trust work are much larger pieces.

All of it is published quarterly, line by line, by every lender of any size. The components are the part worth reading, because the heading blends things that have nothing to do with each other.

What this is NOT

This article explains what a bank's noninterest income heading contains and how it differs from the fee subtotal inside it, using U.S. Bancorp's second quarter 2026 earnings release, filed on Form 8-K, as the example. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold U.S. Bancorp or any security, and it takes no view on the company's results, its pricing, or its strategy. It is not a claim that this lender's fees are high or low relative to anyone else, and it is not a comparison with any other institution. It does not predict future results. Every figure above is taken from the release's own statements and tables; none of them is drawn from the quotation attributed to a named executive in that release, which was checked and contains different figures. The two arithmetic steps here are ours on the release's numbers: that the fee subtotal plus the negative securities line equals the reported total, and the year-over-year percentages computed from the published figures. This is not a political endorsement or criticism of anyone.

Sources

  • U.S. Bancorp, Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, "2Q 2026 Earnings Release," accession 0000036104-26-000039, filed July 16, 2026, income statement and noninterest income detail

Found this useful?

Education only. Nothing here is investment, tax, or legal advice.